Overview of Feedstock Supply Agreements

Digesters, which convert organic feedstock into raw biogas for upgrading into renewable natural gas (RNG), depend on the quality and quantity of available feedstock for successful operation. A reliable and financeable feedstock supply agreement is therefore essential to the success of any digester-based RNG project. These contracts govern the relationship between the suppliers of feedstock and project owners and operators, making them essential to the success of any RNG project and a primary diligence item in any digester financing or investment transaction.

At the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC” or the “Commission”) monthly open meeting on February 19, 2026, the Commission reaffirmed that it will not reinstate its ban on gas pipeline work during appeals.

The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS” or “Service”) recently released detailed guidance concerning the classification and treatment of Prohibited Foreign Entities (“PFEs”) as well as the application of the related Foreign Entity of Concern (“FEOC”) restrictions that were created in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA” or “Bill”).

Enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act and recently amended by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), Section 45Z of the Internal Revenue Code offers a tax credit for the domestic production and sale of certain low-emission transportation fuels (“45Z Credit”). The 45Z Credit is worth $0.20 (or $1.00 for producers meeting prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements) per gallon of renewable diesel, sustainable aviation fuel (“SAF”), renewable natural gas (“RNG”), and certain other low-carbon fuels produced domestically and sold.

In recent years, the U.S. government has become increasingly concerned about foreign ownership of agricultural land. According to the most recent U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) report, foreign owners (primarily Canadian) hold an interest in nearly 45 million acres of U.S. agricultural land.

For consumer packaged goods (“CPG”) founders, understanding the complexities of business structures and tax consequences is essential to maximize growth and attract investors. The Qualified Small Business Stock (“QSBS”) exclusion provides considerable tax advantages when structuring a corporate entity. For example, founders and early investors may be eligible to exclude up to 100% of capital gains on qualifying startup stock from federal income tax—up to $15 million or ten times their investment—which can result in substantial tax savings.

On January 14, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) accepted new rules proposed by Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) regarding the interconnection of High Impact Large Loads (HILLs) and the interconnection of new generation facilities that will be used to serve them, called High Impact Large Load Generation Assessment (HILLGA) in Docket No. ER26-247. This order, along with the recent order directing PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM) to propose rules for Co-Located generation and large loads, offer the first glimpse into how FERC will address the challenges facing the nation’s electricity grid. These include balancing resource adequacy, grid reliability, and fair cost allocation for any needed grid expansions to accommodate new AI-driven data centers.

Investment into data centers continues to increase significantly as the country builds out infrastructure to accommodate the digital economy and growth of artificial intelligence. Many states, including Texas, have now implemented various tax incentives to encourage investment in the state while simultaneously grappling with the taxable aspects of data center fuel. In November 2025, the

Solar developers contend with a wide array of challenges, from competing for viable project sites to combatting disinformation surrounding the expansion of clean energy development. With demand for energy rapidly growing across the nation, considering a full suite of project designs allows developers to put their best foot forward when collaborating with local stakeholders.

Although the use of a shared facilities agreement (SFA) for co-located energy projects is not a new concept, their use has increased significantly in recent years due to the rise in co-located generation, storage, and load infrastructure, particularly in the case of data centers. In general, an SFA grants each party a co-tenancy ownership interest in certain shared facilities, subject to detailed management, operations, and cost-sharing provisions, among other considerations.

Given the increasing frequency of their use, owners, operators, financing parties, and developers should understand when, why, and how SFAs can (or should) be used to avoid potential regulatory, operational, or cost-allocation issues with co-located projects.