Our earlier post examined a hypothetical scenario in which a Texas carbon capture and storage (CCS) developer acquires only surface rights (plus a mineral owner’s surface waiver) over a depleted oil field, injects CO2 for geologic storage, and inadvertently restores the field to commercial oil productivity through CO2 enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR). Because Texas treats the mineral estate as dominant over the surface estate, and because a horizontal or directional well can often be drilled into the storage formation from an entirely separate surface location, Texas law may leave that CCS developer with no reliable way to stop a mineral owner from drilling into and producing from an active storage zone—with potentially severe recapture consequences for tax credits determined for such CO2 under Section 45Q of the Internal Revenue Code.





