The Trump administration issued several executive orders and memorandums on the President’s first days in office, targeting the energy industry. Key actions include halting certain new federal actions for offshore and onshore wind projects and revisiting existing programs and policies. However, the impacts of the executive actions appear to be limited thus far. Privately funded
The dramatic increase in the use cases for data storage, artificial intelligence and cloud computing have resulted in an atmospheric level rise in the demand for data centers, and the question of providing sufficient power to support those data centers has become paramount. Simultaneously, there has been an increasing emphasis on utilizing green energy as corporations and end-market consumers are seeking ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as their own carbon footprints. The co-location of data centers with renewable energy projects, such as solar and wind farms, offers a unique opportunity to address both energy needs and sustainability goals.
While co-location may seem straightforward from a real estate or title perspective—akin to a typical commercial ground lease—there are several legal, environmental, and operational factors that developers and stakeholders need to consider before breaking ground. Examining these considerations, including potential environmental concerns, equipment lifespan, energy load implications, and the overall impact of co-location are critical in determining the financial and practical viability of a development project.
Although artificial intelligence (“AI”) dominated financial, technological, and even social conversations in 2024, less attention was paid to the reality that AI’s emergence entails substantial increases in energy demand, specifically electricity. Consider that a single ChatGPT query requires 2.9 watt-hours of electricity, compared to 0.3 watt-hours for a Google search, according to the International Energy Agency. Data centers housing tens of thousands of square feet of computing hardware power AI technology, and Goldman Sachs Research estimates those data centers will see power demand grow 160% by 2030, when these facilities will use an estimated 8% of all U.S. power.
Renewable energy developers and financing parties are likely aware of the Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (“AFIDA”), a federal law requiring disclosure of foreign investment in agricultural land. Increasingly, U.S. states are imposing AFIDA-like disclosure requirements and restrictions on foreign land ownership, including with respect to renewable energy project sites. This trend is driven by
As year’s end approaches and biogas developers turn from Section 48 investment tax credits (“ITCs”) under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Act”), which required projects to begin construction before December 31, 2024, for eligibility, to Section 48E ITCs, it is critical to understand the differences between how each Section addresses biogas projects. Under Section 48, the Act extended and expanded existing ITCs, adding “qualified biogas property” as property eligible for credits. However, projects that begin construction on or after January 1, 2025, will be subject to the technology-neutral Section 48E clean electricity ITCs, which may leave some biogas property ineligible for credits.
Since Congress first introduced the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) and the beneficial ownership information reporting framework in January 2021, much of the focus has been on the specific reporting requirements that now apply to both domestic and foreign reporting companies (including corporations, limited liability companies, and partnerships). However, the CTA also has far reaching implications for the renewable energy industry and the players involved in tax equity partnerships.
Pressure from consumers, investors, and regulators to provide climate, environmental, and sustainability disclosures is increasing, but it is important for companies to ensure such disclosures are accurate, verifiable, and not misleading to avoid claims of “greenwashing” – making false or unsupportable claims regarding how a company and its products are environmentally friendly or have a
The Texas Attorney General recently issued Opinion KP-0467 (the “Opinion”) addressing “whether a person who negotiates a lease for property for the development of a wind power project on behalf of another, for compensation, must have a license from the Texas Real Estate Commission (“Commission”).”
Put simply, do Texas landmen need a Texas real estate license to negotiate wind leases?
Solar developers in the PJM region, particularly in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio, often encounter land with a complex history of mineral development. This history can significantly impact solar projects, from site planning to obtaining title insurance coverage. Understanding the interplay between surface and subsurface rights is crucial for developers to protect their interests and ensure project viability. Diligent site planning and careful review of mineral title research can go a long way in preventing worst case scenarios and mitigating risk.
As detailed previously, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) offers incentives to renewable energy development that takes place on certain properties that are affected by potential or confirmed contamination. Under the IRA, a 10% adder is available to any investment tax credit (ITC) or production tax credit (PTC) generated by a renewable energy project constructed on a “brownfield site,” and there have been many questions since the IRA’s passage about what constitutes a brownfield site.