Photo of Brittney Beetcher

Brittney Beetcher

Brittney navigates the complexities of corporate, transactional, and securities law. She has drafted and contributed to the negotiation of dozens of shared facilities agreements and other commercial agreements for co-located projects.

Contact:Read more about Brittney Beetcher

Although the use of a shared facilities agreement (SFA) for co-located energy projects is not a new concept, their use has increased significantly in recent years due to the rise in co-located generation, storage, and load infrastructure, particularly in the case of data centers. In general, an SFA grants each party a co-tenancy ownership interest in certain shared facilities, subject to detailed management, operations, and cost-sharing provisions, among other considerations.

Given the increasing frequency of their use, owners, operators, financing parties, and developers should understand when, why, and how SFAs can (or should) be used to avoid potential regulatory, operational, or cost-allocation issues with co-located projects.

On September 4, 2025, the Board of Directors of Southwest Power Pool (SPP), the regional transmission organization (RTO) responsible for much of the central United States, passed Revision Request 696 (RR 696), paving the way for SPP to propose that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) modify SPP’s Open Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff) to create a 90-day path to interconnection for large loads and supporting generation. SPP is expected to file this Tariff change proposal with FERC in the coming weeks. Pending FERC’s decision, SPP aims to administer one of the fastest interconnection study processes in the nation and allow expedited processing of new large loads on the SPP transmission system.

On March 6, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued new rules aimed at standardizing climate-related disclosures by public companies. Commonly known as the SEC climate disclosure rules, they require companies to provide detailed information about their climate-related risks, governance practices, and strategies. Specifically, the rules mandated that companies report their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including Scope 1 emissions (direct emissions) and Scope 2 emissions (indirect emissions from purchased energy); however, the rules faced immediate pushback from various stakeholders, including industry groups and political opponents. In April 2024, the SEC announced a stay of the implementation of the regulations pending judicial review.