Domestic energy production was a subject of much attention in the recently passed federal legislation. That legislation eliminated significant future tax incentives for new construction of large-scale wind and solar projects. Other energy generation sources are expected to be used more intensively and for a longer period of time than previously assumed in order to meet significant anticipated growth in domestic energy demand.
As we have discussed in recent articles and as has been well publicized, two recent actions out of Washington are significantly impacting the renewable energy industry. The recently enacted One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) imposes new deadlines on renewable energy facilities to begin construction and/or be placed into service in order to qualify for tax credits. This is discussed in detail in our recent articles here.
In addition to the OBBBA, on July 7, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO), directing the Secretary of Treasury to—within 45 days following enactment of the OBBBA (which is August 18, 2025)—strictly enforce the termination of renewable energy tax credits. This includes issuing new guidance “to ensure that policies concerning the ‘beginning of construction’ are not circumvented, including by preventing the artificial acceleration or manipulation of eligibility and by restricting the use of broad safe harbors unless a substantial portion of a subject facility has been built.”
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, provides for enhanced restrictions on entities claiming many of the renewable energy credits established under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA). Namely, the bill prohibits foreign entities of concern (FEOCs), as well as domestic entities that are related to or otherwise engage in significant transactions with FEOCs, from claiming such credits. The credits that are subject to the new FEOC limitations under the bill include:
On July 4, 2025, the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (the Act) was enacted. Several provisions of the Act will impact renewable energy projects and the tax credits generated by such projects. Such provisions include the accelerated termination for wind and solar credits, as well as restrictions with respect to foreign entities of concern. Most of the energy provisions of the Act will take effect beginning with the taxable year beginning after that date of enactment (i.e., the taxable year beginning January 1, 2026, for most taxpayers), although there are some deviations, as described below.
Under the Senate Finance Committee’s June 28th version of the One, Big, Beautiful Bill (the “Bill”), there are several limitations and requirements that would take effect based on the date a project begins construction. For solar and wind projects, unless construction begins prior to enactment of the Bill, the production tax credit and investment tax credit under section 45Y and 48E will terminate for projects that are placed in service after 2027. Additionally, certain restrictions on material assistance from prohibited foreign entities would apply to solar and wind projects which begin construction after June 16th and most other projects that begin construction after 2025. The provisions of the Bill are still being negotiated in the Senate. However, establishing the beginning of construction will almost certainly remain important for developers of renewable energy projects.
The Senate Finance Committee recently released its own draft of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (the Bill) previously passed by the House as H.R. 1. Both the House and Senate versions of the Bill impose restrictions on Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) tax credits based on “material assistance” from “Foreign Entities of Concern” (FEOCs). The House version lacked significant details on what “material assistance” was. The Senate Bill provides significant details on the structure and operation of the restrictions.
On June 16, 2025, the Senate Finance Committee released its version of the “One, Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) that would create a steep phase-out of renewable energy tax credits—notably, renewable energy companies would have to start construction on wind and solar projects before December 31, 2025, to receive 100% of the available tax credits. The reconciliation process is far from over, and there are further revisions expected to the text, but the Senate Finance Committee is the final committee in the Senate expected to release legislative text related to energy tax credits.
Its version of the bill includes the following provisions.
Lately, elected representatives on both sides of the aisle have been displaying an appetite for expanding transferable tax credits to a broader variety of industries. This is evidenced by the recent profusion of proposed legislation that endeavors to subsidize emerging or important technologies with such valuable, transferable credits. This glut of proposed legislation—and the significant opportunities it may afford to the savvy buyer or seller—only promises to increase in importance with federal tax reform on the horizon.
On March 6, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued new rules aimed at standardizing climate-related disclosures by public companies. Commonly known as the SEC climate disclosure rules, they require companies to provide detailed information about their climate-related risks, governance practices, and strategies. Specifically, the rules mandated that companies report their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including Scope 1 emissions (direct emissions) and Scope 2 emissions (indirect emissions from purchased energy); however, the rules faced immediate pushback from various stakeholders, including industry groups and political opponents. In April 2024, the SEC announced a stay of the implementation of the regulations pending judicial review.
The Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) recently circulated a Proposed Rule on Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation (“2022 Proposal”). This iteration, as BLM acknowledges, is a revamp of its fraught 2016 attempt to issue a similar rule ostensibly aimed at reducing natural gas waste on federal and Indian leases (“2016 Rule”). The 2016 Rule was ultimately struck down two years ago as unlawful. To the Wyoming federal court, the 2016 Rule sought to regulate air emissions—a role reserved for the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the states—rather than prevent the waste of resources through flaring and other means. Undeterred, the Biden Administration believes it has learned from and theoretically fixed the flaws in the 2016 Rule through the 2022 Proposal. The 2022 Proposal claims to focus on reducing operator costs and generating taxpayer revenue. This is a shift from the 2016 Rule, which relied on the benefits from reduced carbon emissions to justify its issuance. Nevertheless, the question to many stakeholders remains: does the 2022 Proposal still exceed BLM’s authority, or has the agency done enough to win a future legal challenge?