Listen to this post

On August 2, 2024, the Association of American Feed Control Officials (“AAFCO”) announced that its Memorandum of Understanding 225-07-7001 (the “MOU”) with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) outlining the AAFCO ingredient review process would not be renewed on October 1, 2024 when the MOU is set to expire. The MOU, which has been in effect for the last 17 years, established guidelines by which AAFCO reviews the safety and efficacy of new animal feed ingredients under the guidance of FDA. 

Under federal regulations, the FDA maintains primary authority for the regulation of animal foods and feeds. The federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) provides FDA with the authority to regulate all ingredients or additives used in animal feed. AAFCO, a non-profit, voluntary, industry organization, was originally established to create uniform standards and enforcement mechanisms across the animal food industry that would regulate the manufacture, labeling and sale of animal food products. AAFCO membership is largely comprised of federal government agencies, states in the U.S., and governments from other countries that enforce all aspects of the production and sale of animal food products. As part of its mission to guide industry actors to provide health and safety standards for animal feed products, AAFCO provides “model laws” for feed control programs that have been adopted by nearly every state.  

Additionally, AAFCO also provides a process whereby the organization will review the safety, utility, and identity of novel ingredients used in animal feed (the “AAFCO Ingredient Definition Request Process”). If an ingredient is determined to be safe and effective during this review, AAFCO will include a definition of the ingredient in its Official Publication (the “AAFCO OP”). This definition includes the common ingredient name, description, and any appropriate limitations for its use so that both the production and labeling of the product are standardized across the industry. While AAFCO does operate and administer this program, FDA remains involved in the process providing scientific and technical assistance in the review of the ingredients and approving of AAFCO’s final determinations through a letter of concurrence.

Currently, there are three primary regulatory pathways in the U.S. to introduce a novel feed ingredient in animal foods in the U.S.:

  1. The food additive must be provided a definition through an AAFCO Ingredient Definition Request;
  2. The ingredient must be submitted and approved by FDA through a food additive petition; or
  3. The ingredient must be submitted through FDA’s voluntary generally recognized as safe (“GRAS”) notification.

FDA has stated that it will continue to accept AAFCO Feed Ingredient Definition requests until the MOU expires on October 1. However, AAFCO investigators require at least thirty days to prepare ingredient definition requests for the FDA. Thus, any industry groups intending to submit an animal food ingredient though this process will need to submit their request to AAFCO by September 1.

In FDA’s Letter to Stakeholders, FDA stated that it intends to publish a Request for Comments (“RFC” ) for industry to solicit comments to help FDA re-evaluate its pre-market programs for animal foods. Additionally, FDA confirmed that the agency intends to issue two draft guidance documents to aid in the transition phase: Draft GFI #293: FDA Enforcement Policy for AAFCO-Defined Animal Feed Ingredients; and Draft GFI #294: Animal Food Ingredient Consultation (AFIC).

While FDA appears to be considering many options as it reformulates its pre-market approval processes, industry as a whole will be facing a prolonged lapse in regulatory approvals for novel animal feed ingredients come October 1. Without the AAFCO Ingredient Definition Request Process, industry will be required to pursue the more costly and time-consuming process of applying for a food additive petition with the FDA or submitting a GRAS notification. Ultimately, manufacturers and producers of animal food and feed products may see a decline in innovation given the now increased timeline for bringing a new food ingredient to market.

Contact Us

Husch Blackwell has significant experience advising animal feed manufacturers on FDA regulations, including those involving product labeling, formulation, and manufacturing requirements.  Our FDA lawyers have the required scientific and technical backgrounds to assist companies with understanding requirements for product labeling and proposing changes that will be advantageous for their business.  Contact Emily Lyons or your Husch Blackwell attorney for more details.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Emily Lyons Emily Lyons

Emily grew up on a northern Illinois dairy farm, and now helps clients bridge the gap from farm to fork. She guides clients on complex regulatory issues as they bring dairy products, beverages, fruits and vegetables, processed foods and other agricultural goods to…

Emily grew up on a northern Illinois dairy farm, and now helps clients bridge the gap from farm to fork. She guides clients on complex regulatory issues as they bring dairy products, beverages, fruits and vegetables, processed foods and other agricultural goods to market. At the intersection of agriculture, food and environment, Emily handles compliance matters such as labeling, marketing, permitting and agency inquiries including the Food Safety Modernization Act, Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, USDA National Organic Program and bioengineered food disclosure standard, Generally Recognized as Safe status for food additives and food contact substances, and the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65).

Photo of Lauren Petrin Lauren Petrin

Lauren assists food systems and life sciences clients with FDA regulatory compliance.

Lauren entered law school with the intention of working in healthcare; however, her Health Law Certificate courses introduced her to Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory work. Fascinated by the intersection

Lauren assists food systems and life sciences clients with FDA regulatory compliance.

Lauren entered law school with the intention of working in healthcare; however, her Health Law Certificate courses introduced her to Food & Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory work. Fascinated by the intersection of health and consumer protection, she accepted an internship with the FDA’s Office of Legislation, an experience that gave her an inside perspective on the agency’s inner workings and interactions. As an associate at her first law firm, Lauren worked with medical device companies and drug developers, reviewing their claims in light of FDA regulations, negotiating clinical trial agreements, and responding to FDA warning letters and FDA inspections.

In early 2024, Lauren joined Husch Blackwell as a member of the firm’s Food Systems industry group. While she continues to work with clients in the life sciences space, her primary focus is food and agricultural organizations and trade groups, food producers, importers, and other private food companies, whom she advises on compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA); Federal Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA); and other FDA regulations. She assists in the development of corporate compliance strategies, as well as with responses to enforcement actions received from the FDA or U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Lauren enjoys working with such a core component of everyday life and helping companies ensure that their customers are safe.

Known as a detail-oriented, highly responsive professional, Lauren has a reputation for always having solutions ready for clients and attending every meeting with new ideas in hand.